Category Archives: Corporate Commercial

What to Know About Outsourcing in Mongolia

In recent years, in Mongolia outsourcing is becoming a common practice that enables small, medium and sometimes even large businesses to get access to skills and services that they would otherwise find hard to achieve either because of manpower or financial restrictions. So, let’s look into what outsourcing is.

Outsourcing is a business practice of hiring services of another company or individual, either internationally or domestically to perform tasks, handle operations or provide services for your business. The outside company, which is the service provider or a third-party provider, arranges for its own workers and resources to perform the tasks or services either on site at the hiring company’s facilities or at external locations. Outsourcing can also involve hiring individual independent contractors, temporary office workers and freelancers.

There are several models of outsourcing, and depending on the process, one may be preferable over another. Broadly there are three models based on the distance between the hiring company and the third-party provider. These are onshore, offshore and nearshore outsourcing. Onshore outsourcing is when the third-party provider resides in the same country as the hiring company. Offshore outsourcing is opposite of onshore outsourcing, which means the third-party provider resides in another country. Nearshore outsourcing is to hire a third-party provider that resides in neighboring countries or bordering regions.

Companies can outsource a number of tasks and services. Many companies often outsource information technology services, such as software development, infrastructure solutions, software support, as well as technical support. Also, many companies frequently outsource HR tasks, tax accounting and bookkeeping, legal services, customer service and call service, and delivery service (food and goods). For certain processes, like programming, content creation or translation, hiring freelancers on job-to-job basis is becoming more appropriate option.

Companies often outsource as a way to lower costs and improve efficiencies. Companies that decide to outsource rely on the third-party providers’ expertise or innovative technologies, that they don’t have in-house, in performing the outsourced tasks or services to gain such benefits. The underlying principle is that because the third-party provider focuses on that particular task or service, it is able to do it better, faster and cheaper than the hiring company could. Given such benefits, companies often decide to outsource supporting functions within their businesses so they can focus their resources more specifically on their core activities or the areas of the business that are most critical, thereby helping them gain competitive advantages in the market.

Outsourcing, however, can produce challenges and drawbacks for companies. For instance, companies that outsource could face heightened security risks, as they exchange with their third-party providers the company’s proprietary information or sensitive data that could be misused, mishandled or inadvertently exposed by the outsource provider. So, for a company to effectively outsource tasks and services, it is important to focus on the business partnership as much as the logistics. Maintaining and securing a trusted partnership relationship is essential in outsourcing. Therefore, companies engaged in outsourcing must adequately manage their agreements and their ongoing relationships with third-party providers to ensure success. Some might find that the resources devoted to managing those relationships rivals the resources devoted to the tasks that were outsourced, thereby possibly negating many, if not all, of the benefits sought by outsourcing.

There are some important things to remember when drafting an outsourcing agreement. Having the right legal agreement is the central core of a good outsourcing agreement, so seeking expert legal advice ahead of time might be a smart decision. The agreement needs to be fair and clear from the start, in addition to clearly defining what services are being outsourced. While they can be complex, good outsourcing agreements should contain following important information: detailed description of outsourced tasks and services, deliverables/service expectations, payment schedule, terms and conditions, inspection and acceptance, any potential penalties and/or awards, expected timeframe, and potential exit strategies. Formally agreed-upon targets, like service levels, can be a list that is as long or short as the business requires. They should be formed using detailed schedules so neither side has confusion or doubt about what is required of the service provider.  It is important for companies to know when the contractual agreement inevitably times out and ensure that the involved parties fulfill their obligations and stick around until the agreement is up. Therefore, good termination clauses or exit strategies should be in place from the start and continue after the end of the agreement.

There is a variety of other sections a good outsourcing agreement should include: confidentiality clause, independent contractor clause (if the third-party provider is independent contractor or freelancer), warranties, insurance requirements, force majeure, severability, dispute resolution, and governing law (if offshore or nearshore outsourcing). The agreement should discuss retained rights and the fact that each party retains all rights, interest, and title to its own pre-existing intellectual property. The provider should not use pre-existing intellectual property unless it has the right. Also, the clause on confidentiality should be detailed and discuss what constitutes confidential information and how sensitive information is to be handled. It should include specific details on customers’ confidential information and what is not to be disclosed to third parties.

Mongolia Transitions to Digital Public Services

It is becoming imperative for governments to digitize public services, as private sector already has outstripped. So, governments are undergoing digital transformation in order to deliver government services and programs more efficiently, transparently, and cost-effectively. Especially when COVID-19 pandemic hit the world, it became more in demand. Well Mongolia is not lagging far behind.

On October 1st 2020, Communications and Information Technology Authority officially launched and introduced “E-Mongolia” system, an integrated digital system for public services. “E-Mongolia” system allows citizens and legal entities to get government services they need via web portal www.e-mongolia.mn and “E-Mongolia” mobile application at any time, from home or work, from overseas, and without the need to visit government organization (sadly not in all cases). At its launch “E-Mongolia” system offered about 181 types of services from 23 government bodies. Now one year later it is offering over 450 types of services from more than 35 government bodies. But this is not the first-time that digital platform for public services has been introduced. Previously, several government bodies already have separately launched and still continue to operate digital platforms for their services. For example, in early 2000s General Tax Authority initiated and subsequently launched digital system for tax filing, then in 2016 separately launched online VAT incentive system (links can be found on https://mta.mn/). With launch of “E-Mongolia” system all previous public services digital platforms that operated separately are being integrated into one coherent, inter-connected system. Accordingly, this will speed up the exchange of information between government bodies and speed up the decision-making process. As a result, public services will be transparent, fast, hassle-free and accessible to public. However, “E-Mongolia” system is not fully developed yet, and continues to being developed.

Currently the system offers services that are most frequently and widely used by public, such as obtaining various referral statements, getting a passport, a driver’s license, paying various taxes and duties, etc. At first sight it may look like the system offers more services that are geared towards individuals, but there are available many public services for legal entities as well. For example, registering amendments to statutory documents with state registration authority, obtaining a permit to operate a hotel or a tourist camp, obtaining a license to conduct auditing activities, obtaining various referral statements from relevant government bodies, etc. However, public services with more complex nature, like obtaining a land use certificate or an immovable property certificate, or obtaining a construction permit, are still provided in an “old-fashioned” manner. So let’s hope that all public services will be available online very soon.

Resolving Individual Labor Disputes Under the New Labor Law of Mongolia

In the previous post, we mentioned that under the newly revised Labour Law labor disputes in Mongolia may be classified as individual labor rights disputes or collective interest labor disputes. The revised Labour Law introduced significant changes in the mechanisms and procedures for resolution for various types of labour dispute. Here we will describe the new mechanisms put in place for the resolution of individual labor disputes.

Under new Labor Law, legal entities with 20 or more employees are required to establish a permanent part-time Labor Dispute Resolution Commission (“Commission”) which shall manage the conciliation process for individual labor rights disputes. This requirement comes into effect on January 1, 2022. For companies with less than 20 employees, the revised Labour Law establishment of such Commission to resolve disputes at the company level is optional.

For each company the Commission shall be composed of representatives of the employer and the trade union of the business entity or organization, or in the absence of a trade union, an equal number of employees elected by the general meeting of employees.

The Commission is primarily responsible for the preliminary resolution of labor disputes, in particularly individual rights disputes arising in the organization. The disputing party shall have the right to apply to the Commission for resolution of the labor rights dispute within 90 days from the date when he / she knew or should have known about an alleged violation of his / her rights.

For those companies which have not established a “Commission”, or in disputes between “individuals”, the dispute shall be submitted for “conciliation” procedure to the local Tripartite Labour Rights Dispute Settlement Committee at the soum and district level. In the event the disputing parties do not agree with the decision of the Tripartite Settlement Committee, they may file a lawsuit at Civil court (“Court“) within 10 working days from receiving the decision.

In some cases, the court shall have authority to hear the case and decide directly without going through a preliminary conciliation settlement process. These include:

  • claims for damages to the life and health of employees in the performance of their duties;
  • An employee’s complaint that the employer’s illegal decision to terminate the employment agreement, and transfer or reassign the workers position.

Under the new Mongolia Labor Law, detailed rules and regulations are expected to be adopted for implementing the mechanisms for the conciliation procedures and pre-trial settlement of labor disputes.

Avoid Risks in Foreign-Mongolian Cooperation Agreements

Our Mongolian Lawyers regularly assist foreign investors in various forms of joint ventures and business cooperation with Mongolian partners. These partnerships are sometimes necessary to allow a foreign investor to participate where Mongolia law restrictions direct foreign ownership. For example, Mongolian law has certain restrictions on entities with foreign investment owning and using land. One client the firm has worked with, a European party engaged in property development entered into one such arrangement with a Mongolian partner for the development of land located in a special restricted zone of Ulaanbaatar.

The European side, and the Mongolian side entered into a “Cooperation Agreement” which described a cooperative business arrangement in which the European party contributed funding, while the Mongolian party contributed access to the land targeted for development. This type of cooperation, is common in Mongolia between foreign investors and Mongolian property owners, and has been upheld by Mongolian courts.

However, when entering into such an arrangement, a foreign investor should be aware of risks.  A few years into the partnership, relations broke down between the Mongolian party and the foreign investor resulting in extensive litigation over the validity of the Cooperation Agreement and ownership of the land.

Foreign participants in this kind of Cooperation Agreement should engage independent Mongolian legal counsel to review the agreement for compliance with Mongolian law, and to ensure the foreign party is protected. The agreement should be clear about the nature of the cooperation, and the contributions of each party. It is important specify that legal ownership of the land remains with the Mongolian party. To eliminate confusion, there are certain key phrases which should be avoided when describing the foreign investor’s relationship to the land. If the language of the Agreement is ambiguous the Mongolian side may latter attempt to challenge the validity of the Agreement alleging violation of Mongolian law.

Customs Processing and Temporary Warehousing

Our Mongolian lawyers often work with foreign clients and local trading companies involved in import of product into Mongolia. Products entering Mongolia often require short term storage as the products are inspected by Customs. Importers are able to utilize temporary warehousing solutions for these goods for the duration the products are under Customs control yet not yet cleared.

Temporary Customs warehousing may be open for the public, or limited access. Goods are typically placed in temporary storage upon decision by Customs that the goods be stored pending the Customs inspection process. Goods seized by Customs or detained on suspicions of violations of import regulations are also stored in the temporary warehouse.

When goods are placed in temporary storage, a copy of the manifest and other documentation relating to the shipment is kept on file. In normal circumstances storage in temporary warehouses is permitted for a period of up to 2 months from the date of entry. Customs has the option to extent this period for an additional month. For perishable or hazardous goods, storage may be for 2 weeks, with a possible one week extension.

Storage of petroleum products is permitted in a limited access facility operated a licensed fuel importer. Third parties and those not having the necessary import license will not be permitted to store products in such facility.

A party with product in temporary storage may not transfer title to a third party until customs inspection and clearance is completed.

Seizure of Infringing Product by Mongolia Customs

We have written previously about the legal mechanisms for registration of intellectual property rights in the Mongolia Customs database for preventing the intellectual property infringement in Mongolia. In this post we will go more in-depth regarding processes for seizure and detention of suspected counterfeit products by Customs at import or export, which has proven to be effective to fight against the infringement of intellectual property rights in the country.

In general, a holder of intellectual property rights is able to submit an application to Mongolia Customs authorities to take measures to prevent infringing & counterfeit goods from entering into Mongolia when there is evidence known or suspected illegal or counterfeit products are in transit through Customs. An application must contain information about the IP holder, the relevant intellectual property itself; and detailed information about the products requested to be seized.

Upon identifying target goods transiting Customs, authorities may require a cash deposit by the IP rights holder equal to the total value of the seized products (or MNT 1,500,000 if the total value is not possible to determine in advance). Alternatively, the IP rights holder may provide a bank guarantee to cover the deposit value.

This deposit serve as guarantee that the applicant will not cause any undue harm to the exporter or importer of the goods, and if any damage is caused due to false information, the deposit will be used to pay for damages.

The Customs authority will make a decision within 30 working days after receiving the application in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations. If the relevant customs authority decides to detain goods related to intellectual property rights pursuant to an application, it shall notify the Intellectual Property Office and the applicant.

New Intellectual Property Law

Mongolia has enacted several laws in order to implementing the policies to protect and promote intellectual property, namely Law on Patent, Law on Copyright and Related Rights, Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, Law on Innovation and Law on Technology Transfer.

There has been criticism that these laws mainly regulated the protection of intellectual property by the state, but they did not establish a framework for protection of intellectual property in an economic context allowing for the full range of business profit. For instance, intellectual property is protected by patent and trademark pursuant to relevant laws, but the ability of the rights holder to benefit from the intellectual property, by pledging and selling intellectual property rights to legal entities, assigning them to a third party is harmed due to weak economic value.

Therefore, Law on Intellectual Property was newly approved on January 23, 2020, with the aim of increasing the economic value of intellectual property in Mongolia. This law will come into force on December 1, 2020.

The law is expected to clarify the legal rights and authorities of government agencies at various levels in connection with active intellectual property protection and enforcement, including expanding on the rights and duties of Intellectual Property inspectors in charge of investigating alleged infringement.  

At the same time, the law provides greater detail as to role and responsibility of intellectual property agents and brokers which assist IP owners in registering and protecting their IP in Mongolia.

The new law will also expand on the economic rights of Intellectual Property owners, including evaluation and assessment of IP rights, and the extent of state support for economic uses of IP.

Finally, the law aims to reform structure and function of the national Intellectual Property registry, as well as the dispute resolution system for IP related disputes.

With the entry into force of this law, it is expected that it will be easier to put intellectual property into economic circulation; and the intellectual property valuation and mediation will be more reliable; and the activities of the intellectual property organization will be more stable and normal.

M&A for Company in Dominant Market Position

The legal entity in dominant position shall be obliged to file a request to the Authority of Fair Competition and Consumer Protection in case of reorganization by acquiring or merging with other legal entity or by purchasing more than 20 percent of the common shares or more than 15 percent of the preferred shares of a competing company selling or serving similar products, or by merging with a related party.

The Government of Mongolia approved the Resolution No. 118, “Procedure for reorganization of a dominant legal entity through merger or acquisition with other legal entities, and conclusion on the purchase of competitor’s shares” in 2012.

In accordance with this regulation, the Authority of Fair Competition and Consumer Protection shall review the applications and related materials submitted by legal entities and monitor whether competition, mergers and acquisitions result would be the restriction of competition in the market.

The Authority of Fair Competition and Consumer Protection shall review or approve the application within 30 days upon the receipt of the application. This period may be extended by up to 30 days and additional information may be requested to the applicant if necessary.

If the Authority for Fair Competition and Consumer Protection considers that there are conditions to restrict competition upon the reviewing the application, the refusal on reorganization of the dominant legal entity by acquiring or merging with other legal entities will be issued in accordance with above-mentioned procedure.

This refusal by the Authority for Fair Competition and Consumer Protection is a ground for not registering the legal entity reorganized through merger or acquisition, and for not registering the charter of the legal entities that sells or buys the shares.

If it is proved that the benefits to the national economy outweigh the disadvantages to competition in the market, the dominant legal entity will be allowed to register the reorganization by acquiring or merging with other legal entities.

Can Immovable Property be Pledged Twice?

A owner of immovable property (usually real estate or buildings) is entitled to dually promise collateral to others as a pledge on satisfaction of debt. Previously, double collateral was not allowed, if it was prohibited by the agreement between parties. The Constitutional Court made a resolution #11 to repeal this regulation in 2015. Therefore, it is now possible to dual pledge the collateral several times.

When concluding a contract with a subsequent pledgee, the pledgor is obliged to inform the pledgee that the pledge item has already been pledged. If not informed, pledgor should liable for the damage that a subsequent pledgee suffers. A subsequent pledgee has the right to terminate the pledge agreement and may demand compensation for damages. As a best practice, it is recommended to describe the initial pledge within the pledge documentation for a subsequent pledge.

If the previous pledge agreement states terms and conditions of a subsequent pledge agreement, such terms and conditions must be included in a later pledge agreement. If these terms and conditions are not reflected in the next pledge agreement and the previous pledgee submits a claim to the court to invalidate the subsequent pledge agreement, the court will likely consider the later pledge agreement as invalid regardless of whether the secondary pledgee knew or did not know about the original pledge. If the original pledgee and the secondary pledgee are the same, this regulation will not apply.

A dual pledge must be registered at the Mongolian State Registration Office. All subsequent pledges of such property shall be recorded along with the original pledge.

In case collateral is somehow pledged by several persons, a pledgee’s demand will be satisfied via the collateral in the order registered with the State Registration Office. In other words, in satisfying the pledgee’s demand, the pledge item shall be secured in the order registered in the state registry.

If a previous pledgee did not enjoy a preemptive right to demand the secured obligation, first priority right over the collateral will be transferred to next pledgee. A Pledgee shall be obliged to notify other pledgees prior to demanding to satisfaction of a secured obligation from such property. The reason for notifying to other pledgee is, if any of pledgees demanded to satisfy secured obligation from the collateral, other pledgees may demand simultaneous satisfaction although previous and next security period is not due. If other pledgees approve, each secured demand shall be satisfied in order of its performance date.

Setting Agenda for the Regular Shareholder Meeting

A shareholder who has voting rights and holding the company’s common shares with 5 or more percent has entitled to submit the following 4 issues to be included on the agenda of the regular shareholders meeting to the Board of Directors or the executive body within 60 days after the end of the previous financial year. This includes:

  1. Matters falling within the authority of the shareholders meeting
  2. Proposal for nomination of candidate to the member of the Board of Directors;
  3. Proposal on the person to be nominated as a member of the Tabulation Commission

(Please note that if company charter provides number ii) and iii) matters to be discussed by the shareholders meeting)

  1. Proposal on candidate for executive management

Certain requirements and criteria must be met when submitting proposals on matters within framework of authority of shareholders meeting. Thus, the proposal should be made in writing and should include grounds for the proposal, full name of shareholders introducing/proposing the proposal, type of shares he/she owns ( such as common or preferred shares) and number of shares (number of shares owned).

When nominating candidate to the member of the Board of Directors, the tabulation commission and executive body, the full name of candidate (if a candidate is shareholder of the company, number of shares), full name of the nominating shareholder, type and number of shares and grounds for nomination.

Please note that abovementioned criteria are important factor to make decision.

The process of resolving the proposal

If there is Board of Directors, the executive management will submit the proposal to the Board of Directors within 3 working days.  The Board of Directors (in its absence, the executive body) is obliged to check whether the proposal meets the above requirements and, if so, to include it in the agenda of shareholders meeting within 15 working days after receiving the proposal. If the proposal does not meet the requirements, decision on refusal should be delivered to the shareholders who submitted the proposal within 3 working days after the decision was made.

If shareholders who is introducing the proposal (proponent) does not agree with the decision to refuse, the proponent has a right to file to the court.