Tag Archives: Intellectual Property

Understanding Patent Application Modifications: Division, Merging, Amendments, Transfers, and Refusals



Posted by , , ,

When applying for a patent on an invention or a utility model, applicants may need to modify their application for various reasons. This could include dividing, merging, amending, or even transferring the application based on legal requirements. Below, we outline the key aspects of these modifications and what applicants need to keep in mind.

1. Changes Allowed During the Examination Process

After the filing date, applicants can make the following modifications during the substantive examination process, provided they pay the necessary service fees:

1.1 Division of Patent Applications

Applicants may request to split their patent application into two or more separate applications while retaining the original filing and priority date. Each divided application will require its own service fee.

1.2 Merging of Patent Applications

  • If multiple patent applications relate to inventions designed to be used together, they can be merged into a single application.
  • Similarly, utility model applications that are intended for joint exploitation may also be merged.

1.3 Amendments and Changes

legal and technical requirements.

1.4 Transferring Between Patent Types

  • If an invention patent application meets the legal criteria under Articles 8, 9, and 10 of Law on Patent, it may be converted into a utility model patent application.
  • Likewise, a utility model patent application meeting the requirements under Articles 5, 6, and 7 of the Law on Patent may be transferred into an invention patent application.

2. Refusal and Dismissal of Patent Applications

Applicants may voluntarily withdraw or have their patent application refused at any stage of the examination process. However, if a patent application is dismissed and has not been publicly disclosed, it will not be considered part of prior technical knowledge. This means the applicant can submit a new application for the same invention or utility model.

3. Impact of Modifications on Original Application Content

If any modifications change the original content of the filed patent description, the applicant must submit a new patent application instead of an amendment.

Final Thoughts

Understanding these modification options can help applicants navigate the patent application process more effectively. Whether you’re dividing, merging, or transferring your patent, ensuring compliance with the relevant legal provisions is crucial for a successful application.

Making changes to your patent application is easy and flexible—you just need to follow the right steps! If you need help navigating the process, our experts are here to assist you.

đź“Ś #Patent #IntellectualProperty #PatentApplication #IPLaw #Innovation #UtilityModel #PatentRights #BusinessProtection #LegalSupport #TechLaw

Understanding What Cannot Be Patented: A Guide to Non-Patentable Subject Matter



Posted by , , , , ,

Understanding What Cannot Be Patented: A Guide to Non-Patentable Subject Matter

When it comes to patents, not everything qualifies as an invention. Certain ideas, processes, and discoveries are excluded from patent protection for various legal, ethical, and practical reasons. If you’re an innovator, entrepreneur, or researcher, it’s crucial to understand what cannot be patented to avoid unnecessary filings and focus on protectable innovations.

What Is Not Considered an Invention?

The following subject matter does not qualify as an invention and, therefore, cannot be patented:

  1. Scientific Discoveries & Theories – Natural phenomena, scientific principles, and mathematical methods by themselves are not inventions. For example, discovering a new planet or proving a mathematical theorem does not qualify for patent protection.
  2. Computer Programs & Algorithms Alone – While software can be patented under certain conditions, a standalone algorithm or a general computer program is not considered an invention.
  3. Business Methods & Economic Schemes – Methods for conducting business, financial strategies, educational techniques, and mental exercises (such as playing a game) are not patentable.
  4. Urban Planning & Architectural Concepts – The organization and design of buildings, landscapes, and infrastructure projects do not fall under patentable subject matter.
  5. Artistic Designs & Product Shapes – Aesthetic elements related to product design, such as artistic solutions concerning a product’s appearance, do not qualify as inventions (though they may be protected under design rights or trademarks).

Note: If a computer program or algorithm is integrated into a technical solution that contributes to an invention, it may still be eligible for patent protection.

What Cannot Be Patented for Public and Ethical Reasons?

Certain inventions are excluded from patentability due to concerns over public order, ethics, and environmental safety. These include:

  1. Inventions Contrary to Public Order & Morality – Anything that threatens public safety, morality, human and animal health, or the environment cannot be patented.
  2. Living Organisms & Biological Processes – While microorganisms may be patentable, plants, animals, and biological processes for their production (such as breeding methods) are generally excluded.
  3. Plant and Animal Species – Specific breeds of plants and animals cannot be patented under most laws.
  4. Medical Treatment Methods – Surgical procedures, therapeutic treatments, and medical diagnosis methods applied directly to humans or animals are not patentable.
  5. Human Cloning & Genetic Modification – Processes involving human cloning, genetic modifications that alter natural identity, or the industrial/commercial use of human embryos are strictly excluded from patentability.

Understanding these restrictions can help inventors focus on creating patent-eligible innovations. While certain ideas and methods may not be patentable, they could still be protected under alternative intellectual property rights such as copyrights, trademarks, or trade secrets.

By knowing what is not patentable, you can better strategize your intellectual property protection and avoid unnecessary legal hurdles.

âś… “Always consult a patent professional to explore the best options for protecting your innovation. Our firm is here to assist you with your needs.”

#PatentProtection #IntellectualProperty #Innovation #PatentLaw #IPRights #LegalAdvice #TechLaw #BusinessGrowth”

Invention Patents: Understanding Subject Matter and Patentability



Posted by , , ,

Inventions and technical solutions related to products, methods, and operations that exhibit a sufficient level of inventiveness and are applicable to production are recognized as inventions. These innovations can be protected by patents, granting inventors exclusive rights to their creations.

What Makes an Invention “New”?

A technical solution is considered “new” if it is not part of the prior art. The prior art encompasses all publicly available knowledge and disclosures relevant to the invention. Specifically, prior art includes:

  1. Published Solutions or Knowledge: Information that has been published, used, or disclosed—whether orally, in writing, or in any other form—in Mongolia or abroad before the filing date or priority date of the invention.
  2. Previously Filed Inventions: Inventions or utility models filed in Mongolia by other parties before the filing or priority date, provided these were subsequently published in official periodicals and patented.

Exceptions to “Newness” Criteria

An invention will not lose its status as “new” if, within 12 months before the filing date, the inventor or someone who directly or indirectly obtained the information made it public without the applicant’s consent. In such cases, the burden of proof rests on the applicant to demonstrate the circumstances of the disclosure.

Inventive Step

An invention is deemed to involve an inventive step if it provides a clear and significant advancement beyond the prior art. A person skilled in the field should recognize the innovation’s distinct advantages compared to previously known solutions. When assessing the inventive step, the provisions of Article 5.3 of the relevant law do not apply to prior art evaluation.

Industrial Applicability

An invention is considered industrially applicable if it can be produced or utilized in any industry. This ensures that the innovation has practical value and can contribute to economic or technological development.

Conclusion

Understanding the criteria for invention patents is crucial for innovators seeking legal protection for their ideas. By meeting the requirements of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, inventors can secure patents that safeguard their contributions and promote technological progress.

#PatentLaw #InventionProtection #IntellectualProperty #InnovativeSolutions #Patentability #IndustrialApplications #InventiveStep #LegalProtection #TechnologyAdvancement #Innovation

Understanding the Examination Process for Trademark Applications



Posted by , , ,

Navigating the trademark application process can feel daunting, but understanding each step can make it smoother. Here’s a breakdown of the procedure, as outlined by the State Administrative Authority in accordance with the Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications.

The process begins with the examination of the completeness of your application. The authority checks if all required documents are in order and establishes the initial filing date. Therefore, the State Administrative Authority examines the completeness of the trademark application and establishes the initial filing date in accordance with the Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Afterward, the authority evaluates whether the trademark meets the legal requirements and provides a conclusion.

The State Administrative Authority conducts this examination within nine months of the initial filing date. If deemed necessary, this period may be extended by up to six months.

If the trademark is found to meet the legal requirements, the State Administrative Authority issues a conclusion to that effect and, based on it, decides to register the trademark in the state registry.

If the trademark is found not to meet the legal requirements, the authority issues a conclusion to that effect and makes a preliminary decision to refuse the registration, notifying the applicant accordingly in written.

If the applicant disagrees with the preliminary decision to refuse registration, they must submit a reasoned response to the State Administrative Authority within three months of receiving the decision. If the applicant has valid reasons, they may request an extension of up to three months, subject to payment of service fees.

The State Administrative Authority makes a final decision on whether to register the trademark within three months of receiving the applicant’s response.

If the applicant fails to provide a response within the prescribed period, the administrative authority makes a final decision to refuse the registration and notifies the applicant in written.

During the examination, the applicant may introduce changes to the application, except for altering the trademark itself. If adding new goods or services to the classification, a new application must be submitted.

The applicant may also separate an application covering multiple classes of goods or services into individual applications during the examination process.

Interested parties may file an opposition to the trademark application within three months of its initial publication, in accordance with the Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. This period may be extended by up to two months upon request, subject to payment of service fees.

The applicant may submit responses or counterarguments to the State Administrative Authority directly or through an intellectual property representative specified in the Article 16.2 of the Law on Intellectual Property.

The State Administrative Authority delivers notifications to the applicant either in paper form or electronically.

#Trademark #IntellectualProperty #TrademarkRegistration #BusinessLaw #TrademarkProcess #LegalCompliance #IPLaw #TrademarkApplication #GeographicalIndications #TrademarkTips

Understanding the Right to Obtain a Patent



Posted by , , , , , ,

When it comes to protecting intellectual property, obtaining a patent is a crucial step. But who has the right to claim this protection? Here’s a breakdown of key points regarding patent rights, as well as the process for filing a patent application.

Who Has the Right to a Patent?

The inventor of an invention or utility model—or the individuals or legal entities to whom the inventor transfers their rights—is entitled to obtain a patent. However, the specifics can vary depending on the circumstances:

  1. Workplace Creations:
    If an invention or utility model is created in the wrokplace, the right to obtain the patent belongs to the employer.
  2. Agreements and Contracts:
    In cases where inventions or utility models are developed under specific agreements, the rights to the patent are typically granted to the subscriber or financer, unless stated otherwise in the contract.
  3. Joint Creations:
    When an invention or utility model is created collaboratively, the right to the patent is shared jointly among the creators. However, those who merely provided technical, organizational, or financial support—or assisted in the patent application process—are not considered co-creators.
  4. Independent, Identical Inventions:
    If two individuals independently create identical inventions or utility models, the right to the patent is awarded to the person who submits their application first.

How to File a Patent Application

The process for filing a patent application involves several important steps:

  • Submission of Application:
    The inventor—or the individual or entity that has obtained the inventor’s rights—must submit a patent application to the intellectual property organization. This can be done either in paper or electronic form.
  • Representation Through an Agent:
    Applicants may choose to work with an intellectual property agent to assist in filing their application. For foreign citizens, stateless individuals, or foreign entities that are not permanently based in Mongolia, representation through an intellectual property agent is mandatory.
  • Separate Applications:
    A separate application must be filed for each invention or utility model. However, if two or more inventions or utility models serve a single purpose and are used together as a unit, they may be included in a single application.

Understanding your rights and responsibilities when it comes to patents is essential for protecting your innovations. Whether you’re an individual inventor, a company, or a collaborative team, ensuring proper filing and adherence to legal requirements will help safeguard your intellectual property effectively.

Have questions about the patent application process or your rights? Our law firm’s certified intellectual property representatives will provide you professional advice and guidance.

#PatentRights #IntellectualProperty #Inventions #UtilityModels #PatentApplication #Innovation #IPProtection #LegalRights #BusinessLaw #InnovationProtection

Record of Changes in the State registration of Trademark



Posted by , , , ,

In accordance with the Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, several changes can be made to the state registration of a trademark at the request of the trademark owner. These changes are important for ensuring that the trademark records are up to date and reflect any changes in ownership, validity, or other details.

Types of Changes to the Trademark Registration:

  1. Renewal of the Registration Validity Period
    Trademark owners can request a renewal of the registration validity period to extend the protection of their trademark.
  2. Change of Trademark Owner’s Name and Address
    If there is a change in the trademark owner’s name or address, the new details must be updated in the trademark register.
  3. Transfer of Trademark Ownership Rights
    If the ownership of the trademark is transferred, the new owner’s details must be recorded in the state register.
  4. Removal of Items from the Goods and Services List
    The trademark owner may request to remove certain goods or services from the registered list of goods and services associated with the trademark.

Process for Requesting Changes

  • Renewal of Registration Validity
    A request for renewal must be submitted to the relevant government authority either during the last year of the registration’s validity or within six months after the registration expires, during the grace period. Please note that renewing the registration validity will not involve changes to the trademark itself or the addition of new items to the goods and services list.
  • Notification of Changes in Owner Details or Rights
    If the trademark owner changes their name or address, or if there is a transfer of ownership, the trademark owner must notify the relevant government authority in writing or electronically. This notification must occur within six months of the change. Once the notification is received, the change will be recorded in the state trademark register.
  • Public Announcement
    After the changes are made to the trademark register, the government authority will publicly announce these changes through official periodic publications.
  • Service Fees
    There will be a service fee associated with requests for an extension of the registration validity period, changes to the trademark owner’s name or address, or the transfer of trademark rights. These fees are required to process the changes in the state register.

Conclusion

Keeping the state trademark register up to date is essential for trademark owners to maintain the legal protection of their marks. By understanding the procedures for renewing registration, changing ownership details, transferring rights, and updating the goods and services list, trademark owners can ensure their intellectual property rights remain valid and protected.

#Trademark #IntellectualProperty #TrademarkRegistration #BrandProtection #TrademarkOwner #IPRights #LegalServices #BusinessLaw #Mongolia #TrademarkRenewal #TrademarkChanges #Trademarks #StateRegistration #BrandManagement

Importance of Conducting a Preliminary Trademark Search



Posted by

The process of securing intellectual property rights for a brand name or logo often takes more time than anticipated. Receiving a preliminary decision to reject your trademark registration 6-9 months after filing is not the outcome you desire. Such a situation can lead to complications, including having to change your product or service’s brand name, logo, packaging, or advertising content.

Why are trademark applications rejected?

If you intend to register your trademark with the Intellectual Property Office to secure exclusive rights, it’s important to comply with not only international agreements and conventions but also the requirements outlined in Article 5 of the Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications.

What are the requirements?

A trademark may be rejected if it:

· Directly describes the goods or services;

· Indicates the characteristics of the goods or services;

· Specifies the origin or place of manufacture of the goods or services;

· Is identical or similar to a previously filed or registered trademark.

Therefore,

Before filing your brand name or logo, the face of your business, with the Intellectual Property Office, it is advisable to conduct a preliminary search to ensure it complies with legal requirements and does not closely resemble existing trademarks.

Important note!

If your brand name is expressed in a foreign language, it is necessary to conduct searches not only using the primary word but also translations, transliterations, and phonetically similar variations. Additionally, check whether translations might inadvertently include inappropriate or offensive term.

Benefits of a preliminary search

· Prevents receiving a preliminary decision to reject your trademark application due to the reasons mentioned above.

· Avoids the risk of unintentionally infringing someone else’s exclusive rights, thereby protecting you from unforeseen legal liabilities and costs.

By conducting a preliminary trademark search, you can mitigate risks and ensure compliance with regulations. Our law firm, with experienced intellectual property lawyers, is ready to assist you in carrying out professional trademark searches tailored to your needs.

Protecting New Varieties of Plants in Mongolia



Posted by ,

Should you be interested in registering a plant variety created and cultivated by your organization and obtaining the rights for the creator in Mongolia, here is a brief introduction to the relevant regulations and possibilities available.

As a member of the International Plant Protection Convention, Mongolia handles plant variety registrations through the Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Light Industry. This authority oversees the registration process as per the Law on Seeds and Varieties of Cultivated Plants.

The rights for the creator or registration of the plant variety can be obtained for various purposes, including but not limited to conducting scientific research with the Mongolian Institute of Plant Variety, commercial or trade purposes, analysis, experiments, or re-export purposes.

The Law on Seeds and Varieties of Cultivated Plants regulates the relationship between the rights and duties of competent entities, the registration of plant variety names, granting of rights to variety creators, and the importation of seeds for testing purposes. This law works in conjunction with other related laws, such as the Law on Plant Protection, the Law on Customs, and international agreements of Mongolia.

To register a plant, it must not already be registered in Mongolia. The new plant variety’s name should uniquely identify the variety, respect the rights of others, not be represented by a single number, and not be misleading or misrepresentative of the plant’s characteristics, value, uniqueness, or the creator’s identity.

The creator must obtain a permit to use propagation material of the protected variety for production, reproduction (breeding), creating breeding conditions, offering for sale, selling and marketing, exporting, importing, and creating reserves for any of the above purposes. The request for the creator’s rights should be submitted to the Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Light Industry of Mongolia. The variety must be determined as new, distinct, uniform, and stable, as described below:

  • New Variety: The propagation and yield material of the variety has not been sold or distributed by the creator, either personally or with their consent, within one year in Mongolia, or within four years in other countries (six years for trees and shrubs).
  • Distinct Variety: The variety is clearly different from existing, well-known varieties at the time of the request.
  • Uniform Variety: The basic characteristics of the variety are sufficiently consistent during changes that may occur depending on the propagation.
  • Stable Variety: The main characteristics of the variety do not change after repeated propagation or at the end of each propagation cycle.

The request, along with the introduction and materials, is subject to expert review and verification by the Mongolian Institute of Plant Variety under the Ministry. Once obtained, the right of the variety creator is valid for 20 years from the issuance date, and 25 years for trees and creepers, according to the Law on Seeds and Varieties of Cultivated Plants of Mongolia.

Protection of Newly Created Plant Varieties in Mongolia



Posted by , ,

Following a process of technical consultations with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Mongolian Parliament enacted the Law on Seeds and Varieties of Plants on October 15, 2021 to regulate issues related to supporting the development of the sector of crop seeds, stimulating research and innovation in the seed sector, establishing fair trade of seeds, protection and sustainable use of plant genetic resources, creation of new plant varieties, protection of breeder’s rights and ensuring food safety.

In specifically, this law regulates the registration of a new plant varieties and the protection of the breeder’s rights. Any person who produces, sell, export and import a registered and protected plant varieties is required to obtain permission from a breeder. The protection of breeder’s right is valid for 20 years for plants and 25 years for trees and climber plants.

Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Light Industry is entitled to register a new variety plant in Mongolia and to protect breeder’s right. In determining whether or not the breeder is entitled to apply a new variety plant registration, the Minister of Food, Agriculture and Light Industry should identify that the plant is new, various, identical and stable by doing necessary field experiments and laboratory tests. These four requirements are described as below.

New – the seed and plants variety are considered new if it is not sold or distributed throughout a certain time prior to the request date:

  • 1 year ago, in the territory of Mongolia;
  • four years ago, in the territory of other countries and six years ago for trees and shrubs.

Various – if the newly created variety differs clearly from other popular varieties at the time of the request, it is considered to be different.

Identical – if the basic characteristics of the variety are sufficiently maintained during changes that may depend on the characteristics of the reproductive structure, then the seed is considered an identical variety.

Stable – After repeated reproductive cycles, if the basic characteristics of the seed do not change at the end of a specific cycle, the seed is considered a stable variety.

Therefore, it is significant to first clarify whether a plant variety can be considered as a new variety plant in Mongolia, whether breeder’s plant variety sold or distributed before in Mongolia and oversees during period mentioned above.

Invalidating a Mongolian Trademark



Posted by ,

In the past weeks the firm’s Mongolian lawyers have been approached with an inquiry regarding the possibilities to request trademark invalidation in Mongolia.

Registration of trademarks can be invalidated by a request filed with the Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC). There are several acceptable reasons for trademark invalidation.

Any interested person may submit to the DRC a request for invalidation of a trademark registration on the ground of followings:

  • Trademark is registered in violation of registration requirements;
  • The trademark is registered in the member country of Paris Convention under name of any representative of distributor without permission of rights owner of the given trademark;
  • A trademark owner hasn’t used the trademark for 5 years without any reasonable excuses.

Such an invalidation request is acceptable in Mongolia if it was submitted within one year from the date on which the registration of the conflicting trademark was published by the Intellectual Property Office. The DRC with the authority to decide whether or not a trademark is invalid within 6 months from the date of receipt and notify it to petitioner.

Although Mongolian Trademark law provides any interested person to dispute about trademark registration validity within specific reasons, a one-year limit for a request submission is too short. After this time frame has passed, it becomes more difficult to invalidate trademark registration based on a request of likelihood of confusion.

The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (Paris Convention) which is ratified by Mongolia, provided longer time limit for filing a trademark invalidation request. For example, article 6bis of the Paris Convention entitles the owner of a well-known mark to file an invalidation request of conflicting trademark in 5 years from the date on which the registration of the conflicting trademark was published. Therefore, a period extension for invalidation request is required for the purpose of harmonizing Mongolian law with international treaty.