Introduction to Mongolia’s Law on Digital Signatures

A newly revised Law on Electronic Signatures was adopted in December 2021 and will come into force on May 1^st, 2022.

The Revised Law distinguishes between electronic signatures and digital signatures. The Law provides that an electronic signature shall be used for electronic information that has been converted from paper form to electronic form by means of an information system, or created, sent, received, stored or accessed in an electronic environment (except for those classified as state secrets).

Generally digital signature is characterized by a unique feature that is in digital form like fingerprint that is embedded in a document. The Law provides that digital signature is a form of an electronic signature, and is an information that is encrypted and converted into digital signature by using private key and can be verified and validated by using a public key. With regards to legal entities, pursuant to the Law legal entities shall use digital seals, which must meet the requirements for digital signatures. The authorized representative of legal entity shall be the holder of the digital seal. The signer shall be required to have a certificate so that he/she can be linked to the document (information). Digital signature shall be as valid as the written signature on paper document.

Along with the certificate the signer shall be required to have a digital signature tool used to create the digital signature and retain private key. The Law specifically provides that for Mongolian citizens their ID cards shall be one of types of digital signature tools, that is information on citizen’s digital signature, certificate and private key shall be placed in the memory chip of ID card. The Law does not set a legal limit on the types of digital signature tools, but a list of eligible tools shall be issued by the Ministry of Electronic Development and Communications.

In accordance with the Law now not only Mongolian citizens and legal entities, but also foreign citizens and stateless persons shall be able to use digital signatures. Also, now a digital signature certificate issued by foreign authority may be used in the same way as Mongolian certificate provided that conditions set forth in the Law are met and in accordance with procedures set forth in the Law. Meaning that digital signatures authorized by foreign certification authorities may be used, whereas the current law does not allow it.

Furthermore, the Law sets forth more detailed requirements for digital signature certificates, certification authorities, their rights and obligations, rights and obligations of government authorities.

The Parliament of Mongolia amended the Constitution of Mongolia on November 14, 2019, according to the second part of Article 6.2 of the Constitution of Mongolia “… By using subsoil resources within the right of citizens to live in a healthy and safe environment have the right to know about the impact on the environment”.

In order to exercise this constitutional right, the Law on Environmental Protection and the Law on Environmental Impact Assessment provide for measures to be taken by citizens to monitor the status of subsoil use, environmental impact, rehabilitation and monitoring by the authorities. The legal regulation of the right to know and the legal regulation of the exercise of constitutional rights are in the process of being approved.

This is very important regulation. There are frequent tripartite disputes between citizens and company using subsoils or project implementer and local authorities such as Governor and Citizens’ Representative Meeting.

Citizens complain that companies using subsoil in local area and project implementers are destroying the environment and failing to rehabilitate it, and demand that action be taken to stop the activity.

The reason for this is that citizens are not given the right to know and the information they want has not been provided. In other words, failure to provide information or access to information on the current status of subsoil use, its impact on the environment, and the process and results of rehabilitation, the lack of access to information has led to a number of negative consequences, such as misinformation and misunderstandings.

On the other hand, due to the failure of the local government to provide the above information to the citizens, the citizens have lost trust in the local governors and the Citizens ‘Representatives’ Meeting and therefore there have been many cases that citizens criticized local government that not protecting their rights and interests instead protecting and serving the interests of the company using subsoil and project implementers.

As a company using subsoil and project implementer, they have spent a certain amount of money and have conducted certain activities, such as employing local people, providing financial support for local development, and conducting regular rehabilitation work. Lack of information or access to information has led to many misunderstandings and conflict among citizens due to a lack of information about their work and investments.

Therefore, it is important to ensure that citizens have access to information and right to know, and that local governments and project implementers are required to report their work and the results of their activities in connection with proving information to citizens.

According to the two laws mentioned above, on the one hand, the law allows a citizen may request information from the aimag, capital city, soum and district governors, project implementer on the condition of natural resource use within the territory, its impact on the environment, rehabilitation process and control measures taken by the state authorities and project implementers.

On the other hand, aimag, capital city, soum and district Citizens ‘Representatives’ Khurals and Governors shall openly inform citizens about the conditions of land use, environmental impact, rehabilitation and control measures within the territory, and provide relevant information upon request, and therefore obliged to report it to the Citizens’ Representatives Meeting.

As a project implementer, they are obliged to provide or provide information on the status of subsoil use, environmental impact, rehabilitation process and results related to its activities at the request of the citizen.

In recent years number of companies and organizations have come out and sold various “coins” and tokens. Although virtual asset services have the advantage of using technological advances to increase access to finance at low cost, the process of trading coins and tokens is carried out in very short term and at high prices. As a result, special legal regulations became necessary due to high risk of possible increase of cybercrimes, and as consequence individuals and investors to become victims of cybercrimes, or even unknowingly get involved in money laundering and terrorist financing crimes said lawmakers. Thus, the first draft of Law on Virtual asset service providers was submitted by the Government on May 12, 2021 and the parliament adopted it on December 17, 2021. The law came into force on February 25, 2022.

Pursuant to law public offerings and trading of virtual assets now can be done only through companies registered as virtual asset service providers. Companies that want to provide virtual asset services and that meet requirements set in law and ancillary regulations on combating money laundry, terrorist financing and risk mitigation can be registered with Financial Regulatory Commission (FRC) as virtual asset service providers. Once registered virtual asset service providers shall be obliged to identify its customers, determine the legality of their assets, and inform customers in advance about risks of becoming victims of technical and fraudulent crimes in the process of possessing and trading of virtual assets.

Pursuant to law eight ancillary regulations must be adopted, which are currently being developed by FRC. FRC is currently conducting survey on some of the draft regulations. You can read the draft regulations (only Mongolian versions are provided) (the link http://www.frc.mn/a/3910) and send your proposal by March 27, 2022.

FRC shall not register any company as virtual asset service provider within four months from the date the law came into force. This period is given for FRC to develop and adopt aforementioned ancillary regulations. Companies that provided virtual asset services before the law was adopted shall satisfy all requirements set in law and ancillary regulations within three months after expiration of the four-month period and may be registered with FRC as virtual asset service provider.

The law expressly provides that registration of a company as virtual asset service provider is not considered as guarantee for the virtual asset. The government shall not be responsible for any damages resulting from activities related to virtual asset service, and public offerings and trading of virtual assets through a company not registered as virtual asset service provider is prohibited.

An individual or legal entity that violates the law shall be subject to liability specified in Criminal Code or Law on Infringements. Administrative penalty for violation of law for individuals is fine in the amount equal to from 1 million MNT up to 3 million MNT, for legal entities is fine in the amount equal to from 10 million MNT up to 200 million MNT.

So, it looks like in October virtual asset market will start to be more regulated and well-ordered.

The parliament adopted a revised Law on Protection of personal information on December 17, 2021, and this law will come into force on May 1, 2022. This law is a revised version of current Law on Individual secrecy, which will be repealed on the date when revised law comes into force.

Current Law on Individual secrecy was adopted in 1995. It has passed over 20 years since then and social relations have changed and evolved a lot. The revised law covers a wider range of personal information than the current law, and regulates protection of personal information rather than “personal secrets”. Law on Protection of personal information covers personal information (such as name, date and place of birth, citizenship, educational background, membership, information on property, etc.) and sensitive information (such as nationality, religion, gender, key to digital signature, criminal and medical records, sexual orientation, correspondence, etc.), which also include genetic and biometric information.

The revised law introduces several novelties. One of them is that any personal and sensitive information must be collected, processed and used with a written consent from owner of the information (either written on paper or electronically), with exception of cases specified in laws. Pursuant to current Law on Individual secrecy only owner of personal information has responsibility to protect his/her own “personal secrets”. When the revised Law on Protection of personal information comes into force the responsibility to protect one’s personal information shall be imposed also on government bodies, individuals, legal entities and organizations without the rights of a legal entity that legally collected, processed and used personal information. Also, lawmakers differentiated criminal liabilities for disclosure of personal information via telecommunications and the Internet, and toughened criminal penalties.

The revised law also regulates matters and restrictions related to installation of cameras, voice recording devices and making of recordings in public places, offices and/or at home, processing and use of such recordings.

It is common practice for a real estate developer to take an order or advance payment from customer for an apartment building, obtain an uncompleted building certificate from the state registry, and pledge the certificate to a bank or non-bank financial institution and obtain loan in order to finance the project.

According to the State Registration Agency, as of September 30, 2020, 552 uncompleted buildings in Ulaanbaatar were registered as real estate. Of these, 123 uncompleted buildings are pledged as collateral for loans from banks and financial institutions. In addition, there are 333 people who have not been able to obtain a real estate certificate even though the building has been completed and people has purchased the apartment. Moreover, bribery of the General Authority of State Registration in order to obtain a real estate certificate, as well as the creation of a network of bribes through acquaintances, is due to the regulation of registration of uncompleted buildings as real estate.

Therefore, taking into account the above circumstances, Article 10.10 of the Law on State Registration of Property Rights” amended as “An apartment building will not be registered in the state registry of property rights until it is commissioned/ handed over for permanent use” and the amendment was supported by the relevant standing committee and was recently submitted to the plenary session of the Parliament.

It is an important to change the regulations that corrects the practice of registering uncompleted buildings as real estate which violates citizens’ property rights, and creates new regulations related to the rights of public apartment and surrounding land. In addition, the amendments are based on the need to harmonize the Civil Code and the Land Law, including the need to change and improve the regulation of serious violations of citizens’ property rights related to public housing/apartment.

Holders of Intellectual Property rights (IP) registered in Mongolia have the option to register these rights with Customs. This registration allows an IP holder an important tool to prevent import or export of counterfeit products into or out of Mongolia.

In order to be included in the customs database, an IP rights holder must submit a request to the General Customs Administration to include the holder’s IP rights in the Customs database. Such request shall contain the details of the goods related to the intellectual property rights, information of the holder, documents confirming the intellectual property rights, along with a list of goods to be registered and protected. There is no official fee for this registration.

The decision to register goods related to intellectual property rights in the Customs database is finalized by the head of the department in charge of control and risk of the Central Customs Administration. Information registered with the central database is shared with regional Customs offices around the country.

IP holders should take care to report to Customs and request updated registration with Customs when any important information regarding the IP rights is changed, including duration of protection, name of the rights holder, or others.

The Central Customs Administration may publish the list of goods registered in the Customs database and changes thereto in the official customs edition and some other information on the customs website with the permission of the rights holder.

We have written previously about the legal mechanisms for registration of intellectual property rights in the Mongolia Customs database for preventing the intellectual property infringement in Mongolia. In this post we will go more in-depth regarding processes for seizure and detention of suspected counterfeit products by Customs at import or export, which has proven to be effective to fight against the infringement of intellectual property rights in the country.

In general, a holder of intellectual property rights is able to submit an application to Mongolia Customs authorities to take measures to prevent infringing & counterfeit goods from entering into Mongolia when there is evidence known or suspected illegal or counterfeit products are in transit through Customs. An application must contain information about the IP holder, the relevant intellectual property itself; and detailed information about the products requested to be seized.

Upon identifying target goods transiting Customs, authorities may require a cash deposit by the IP rights holder equal to the total value of the seized products (or MNT 1,500,000 if the total value is not possible to determine in advance). Alternatively, the IP rights holder may provide a bank guarantee to cover the deposit value.

This deposit serve as guarantee that the applicant will not cause any undue harm to the exporter or importer of the goods, and if any damage is caused due to false information, the deposit will be used to pay for damages.

The Customs authority will make a decision within 30 working days after receiving the application in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations. If the relevant customs authority decides to detain goods related to intellectual property rights pursuant to an application, it shall notify the Intellectual Property Office and the applicant.

Our Mongolian lawyers often work with foreign clients and local trading companies involved in import of product into Mongolia. Products entering Mongolia often require short term storage as the products are inspected by Customs. Importers are able to utilize temporary warehousing solutions for these goods for the duration the products are under Customs control yet not yet cleared.

Temporary Customs warehousing may be open for the public, or limited access. Goods are typically placed in temporary storage upon decision by Customs that the goods be stored pending the Customs inspection process. Goods seized by Customs or detained on suspicions of violations of import regulations are also stored in the temporary warehouse.

When goods are placed in temporary storage, a copy of the manifest and other documentation relating to the shipment is kept on file. In normal circumstances storage in temporary warehouses is permitted for a period of up to 2 months from the date of entry. Customs has the option to extent this period for an additional month. For perishable or hazardous goods, storage may be for 2 weeks, with a possible one week extension.

Storage of petroleum products is permitted in a limited access facility operated a licensed fuel importer. Third parties and those not having the necessary import license will not be permitted to store products in such facility.

A party with product in temporary storage may not transfer title to a third party until customs inspection and clearance is completed.

Our Mongolian Lawyers regularly assist foreign investors in various forms of joint ventures and business cooperation with Mongolian partners. These partnerships are sometimes necessary to allow a foreign investor to participate where Mongolia law restrictions direct foreign ownership. For example, Mongolian law has certain restrictions on entities with foreign investment owning and using land. One client the firm has worked with, a European party engaged in property development entered into one such arrangement with a Mongolian partner for the development of land located in a special restricted zone of Ulaanbaatar.

The European side, and the Mongolian side entered into a “Cooperation Agreement” which described a cooperative business arrangement in which the European party contributed funding, while the Mongolian party contributed access to the land targeted for development. This type of cooperation, is common in Mongolia between foreign investors and Mongolian property owners, and has been upheld by Mongolian courts.

However, when entering into such an arrangement, a foreign investor should be aware of risks. A few years into the partnership, relations broke down between the Mongolian party and the foreign investor resulting in extensive litigation over the validity of the Cooperation Agreement and ownership of the land.

Foreign participants in this kind of Cooperation Agreement should engage independent Mongolian legal counsel to review the agreement for compliance with Mongolian law, and to ensure the foreign party is protected. The agreement should be clear about the nature of the cooperation, and the contributions of each party. It is important specify that legal ownership of the land remains with the Mongolian party. To eliminate confusion, there are certain key phrases which should be avoided when describing the foreign investor’s relationship to the land. If the language of the Agreement is ambiguous the Mongolian side may latter attempt to challenge the validity of the Agreement alleging violation of Mongolian law.